What is Wahhabism

-

 

What is Wahhabism? What is terrorism?

I understand that an explanation is needed.

 

When Wahhabism was introduced as a terrorist movement, while the Malayalee Salafi / Mujahideen brothers were wondering why they were agitated, there were some local experiences that helped identify their sentiment. So, let me explain a little bit ..

 

One:

 

I have some applications of my own. Those who follow me know that. For those who have recently passed, and for those who do not yet understand the true meaning of such expressions. The term Salafism is primarily meant in recent times to refer to the Ahlus-Sunnah Manhaj movement, as shown by Shaykh al-Islam ibn Taymiyyah and Shaykh Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab. Both of them are basically Hampi Madhhabs. Independent positions have been taken on very few matters. They are revered, as are the scholars of the earlier Madhhab, with agreement + disagreement.

 

Wahhabism, however, claims to have adopted the Manhaj of the Shaykhs, and to have adopted a more radical religious view than their moderate position, and a political position that neutralized the broader sense of ummah they had shown. Its spokesmen are the Saudi dynasty and a few of its allies. 'Wahhabism' is in line with Saudi political interests. Saudi Arabia is called Wahhabism because of the ideological connection that Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab artificially attached to it.

 

Insha Allah, I am planning to use the word 'Saudi' in this position. It is defined as a politically motivated religious policy put forward by the Saudi king and court scholars. The term can also be used to refer to those who consider Saudi equality to be Islam. 'Wahhabism' is no longer used only when it is necessary to clarify the purpose.

 

There is another reason for the use of the word 'Saudi'. That is: The movement of the Shaykh is made up of two elements: the royal family of Ibn Saud and the family of Shaykh Muhammad. The first element continues as kings and the second element as religious leadership. After the demise of the Sheikh, the royal family of Saudi Arabia was more important than the Sheikh's successors, the Ulema. The only goal is to wipe out the country. Under the leadership of King Abdulaziz, with the financial assistance of the British Military, the territories of Najd, Makkah and Madinah, now part of the Ottoman Caliphate, were razed to the ground in a bloody battle, and in 1925, with the approval of the British (Mലlaka = monarchy), the king chose the name 'Al-Ma'lma' al-Ma'lam. = The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The position of the sheikh who gave an ideal was concealed and the family name of the royal family who cleared the land was glorified. Sheikh, who started burying after his death, ended up in a big jar with the kingdom. Therefore, the name Saudi is more in agreement.

 

Appendix:

 

Some in Kerala and abroad still call the Shaikh who overthrew the Jara industry Wahhabism. It's their choice. But if you ask me if it's inappropriate, it's not. It is often asked whether the name should be added to the Sheikh's name or not to the Sheikh's father. What's that for? Introduce a movement to the Father. The movement of Imam Ahmad is called Hambali. Humble is named after his father.

 

'Wahhabis to the Mujahideen

They did not adopt the name themselves. It has been attributed to them by their opponents. ' Even if it's true, so do many of us; The name given by the opponents will be famous. 'We call them' Mu'tazilah ', regardless of their own name, Ashabut Tawheed wal Adl (People of Tawheed and Righteousness). The name Jahmi was not given to those who heard the call; We Sunnis all together called them. Some even gave the name to the Ash'aris. Rafidis are called Rafidis whether they are themselves or not. Then, we can call our opponents whatever we like; It is not fair to say that we should not be called back.

 

The movement has been known as Wahhabi since the time of the Shaykh, as it has no other name (Salafi came later; a name is needed to know a person). The title of the Khandana work written by the Shaykh's brother was 'Azwaqaul Ilahiyya Fir Raddi Alal Wahhabiya'. In this regard, the eminent Arab historian Zahira Khuddura, in his book Tariq al-Arabil Hadith, states that the name of the Shaykh movement was Wahhabi during the time of the Shaykh.

 

The latter were proud of the app. The movement was introduced by the British and other global Muslim personalities as Wahhabis; The movement 's followers were excited to quote them. E Moidu Moulavi, an early Mujahideen leader and historian of the movement in Kerala, wrote in his book, "Indian Muslims and the Freedom Movement:" It is a very religious movement. Sheikh Muhammad, the son of Abdul Wahab, the great scholar of Najd, was the founder of this movement "(p. 61).

 

Muhammad al-Hamid al-Faqih (d. 1959), founder of Muhammadiyah and author of several books on the Ansar Sunnah, the Salafi movement in Egypt, gave the book a long introduction to the Salafi movement, entitled 'Wahhabiya fi Islahiddin in Azar al-Awwa'.

 

Therefore, there is nothing inappropriate in calling the Shaykh movement Wahhabism. To identify Sheikh and Saudi Arabia as two, I name both. If those who say that the two are the same call both Wahhabism, I do not question them.

 

But when global politics treats Wahhabism as a 'terrorist' movement, pushing innocent Salafi brothers into the fold by calling them Wahhabis is utterly violent. I have long been opposed to the attempt to portray Saudi Arabia as a terrorist state.

 

Two:

 

Terror face.

 

So what is the terrible face of Wahhabism ?! Doesn't that mean Saudi terrorism? I now realize that it would lead to such a reading. I have no such intention. To carry out an armed revolution to seize land, to inculcate shirk in the most serious sense of the word, to kill and execute the people who are supposed to carry out the policy, to give milk and honey to the country, to build an armed rebellion in the harams for the sake of Britain, which is still in favor of global political issues, in the interests of the global Muslim world. I think the word 'terror' only means to exaggerate Shia fears for the sake of interests.

 

If anyone thinks beyond that and misuses that word, they should find another word for 'bleeding' instead. In today's world politics, we cannot throw any Muslim country in front of our enemies.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Umayyad @ Spain

-
Image
          The Abbasids conquered Damascus, the capital of the Amavis, and began massacring members of the Amavi family. Abdur Rehman, a member of the Amavi family, was 19 at the time. He hid with his family in a house in the middle of a forest on the banks of the Euphrates River. When the Abbasid army arrived, Abdurrahman hid through the back door. Abdurrahman crossed the river and reached Egypt on the other side and from there to Africa. During this time he came in contact with some people in Spain. With their help they reached Spain and established an independent government there. Abdurrahman Dakhil This Amavi regime in Spain lasted for two and a half centuries. Abdurrahman established the government after coming from another country. In that sense, history calls him Abdurrahman Dakhil. Abdurrahman chose the city of Cordoba as his headquarters. Jamie Qurtuba is the mosque he founded there. He ruled for 33 years. Hisham I. After the death of Abdurrahman Dakhil,...
Read more

The Crusades

-
Image
 The Crusades are a series of two centuries - long series of battles between East and West, or between Islam and Christianity. These were the struggles of the Christian governments of Europe against the Eastern Muslim world as a symbol of the cross. This series of collisions between the Moon and the Cross played a major role in rewriting the course of world history.  These battles, which took place between 489 and 691 AH (1096-1292 AD), are known as the Crusades or Crusaders, and the participants were known as the Crusaders. Some Orientalists describe all clashes between Christians and Muslims as crusades. The Crusades began at the behest of Pope Urban II. At his command, the saint Peter traveled throughout the country and prepared the people for it. Peter, a brilliant orator and mastermind, was quick to ignite religious sentiment in the minds of Christians. Although it is known as a religious holy war, the Crusaders were driven by material interests. The obvious reason for th...
Read more

MAMLUK DYNASTY

-
Image
                  The Mamluk dynasty is one of the strangest events in the history of the world, organized by slaves from all walks of life. It was organized by slaves who were imported by the caliphs from different countries. The founder of the Mamluk dynasty was Shajar al-Durd, a woman who was a slave of Caliph al-Mustasim. Mahathir, a Turk, gave birth to a child in Salih, of Ayub descent, and was freed. With the demise of her husband Salih, Shajar rose to power in Egypt. Their reign lasted about two and a half months. They were able to see a lot of activity in this short period of time. They were notable for smashing coins and so on.       Izzuddin Ibn Bakr was elected the next ruler of Egypt. With that, Shajar adorned his wife's position and tried to maintain control over the administration. Shajar kills him when he learns that Ibak is trying for another marriage. Knowing this, his other wives also killed Shajar.   ...
Read more